Non-BMW screenwash hits owner’s warranty

Dealer charges for £163 repairs after Simon uses supermarket brand but manual is confusing

Manufacturers often recommend owners use a specific brand of oil or brake fluid but a BMW driver has highlighted that unless you use the official screenwash as well, you risk an expensive repair bill.

Simon Raeburn, of Tavistock, Devon, had used Morrisons’ own screenwash on his 64-plate 335d; this costs 50p per litre, compared with £4.50 for the manufacturer’s. When the car’s jets blocked in March, he took it to Ocean BMW, in Plymouth, but was refused a repair under warranty.

Simon said: “They told me I should have been using BMW’s anti-bacterial washer fluid, and, should the jets be blocked, the warranty would not apply.” The dealer then landed him with a £163 bill to flush the system and replace the bottle and strainers.

He grudgingly paid up, but called Auto Express after noting his owner manual made no mention of sticking to a special BMW product. Instead, it simply states: “Do not mix any screenwash concentrates of different manufacturers, as this may otherwise block the washer nozzles.”

We called BMW and its spokeswoman initially said: “It’s imperative that the correct concentration of washer additive is added during all top-ups to the screenwash reservoir. In this case, the customer has used a screenwash from Morrisons, which isn’t of the correct concentration level.”

When we pointed out there’s no mention of this in the manual, she replied: “In this case, the customer has used a non-BMW product, therefore mixing different fluids and invalidating the BMW warranty.” Simon had been using Morrisons’ washer fluid for around two years, so we argued he was not mixing the fluids, but rather replacing one brand with another. The spokeswoman said: “There might still be a residue from the previous product. You would find it difficult to remove all traces.”

By this logic, owners could only ever use BMW washer fluid, or risk falling foul of this implied warranty clause. The manual should state this condition explicitly, because the guidance as it stands is at best misleading.

We said Simon should be refunded the £163 he paid, and the manual wording be changed. BMW said it plans to do neither.

Most Popular

Top 10 best cheap-to-run cars 2022
Toyota Prius front 3/4 cornering
Best cars
17 Jan 2022

Top 10 best cheap-to-run cars 2022

UK road tax 2022: VED tax rates and bands explained
2021 Road Tax explained
Car tax
20 Jan 2022

UK road tax 2022: VED tax rates and bands explained

Best new car deals 2022: this week’s top car offers
Mazda MX-5 Deals
Deals
21 Jan 2022

Best new car deals 2022: this week’s top car offers

Tips & advice

View All
Car dashboard warning lights: the complete guide
Car dashboard symbols and meanings
Tips and advice
10 Aug 2021

Car dashboard warning lights: the complete guide

Electric car charging stations: a complete guide
Electric car charging station
Tips and advice
5 Nov 2021

Electric car charging stations: a complete guide

PCP vs HP – which type of car finance is right for you?
PCP vs HP
Car buying
21 Jan 2022

PCP vs HP – which type of car finance is right for you?

Average speed cameras: how do they work?
Average speed cameras: how do they work?
Tips and advice
23 Jul 2021

Average speed cameras: how do they work?

Best cars

View All
Top 10 best car interiors 2022
Peugeot 208 hatchback
Best cars
25 Jun 2021

Top 10 best car interiors 2022

Top 10 best electric cars 2022
Ioniq 5
Best cars
19 Jan 2022

Top 10 best electric cars 2022

Top 10 best cheap-to-run cars 2022
Toyota Prius front 3/4 cornering
Best cars
17 Jan 2022

Top 10 best cheap-to-run cars 2022

The UK's top 10 fastest hot hatchbacks 2022
Audi RS 3 driving - front view
Hot hatches
21 Jan 2022

The UK's top 10 fastest hot hatchbacks 2022