In-depth Reviews

Peugeot RCZ owner reviews

“The Peugeot RCZ is a coupe with the styling of a concept car, which was on sale from 2009 to 2015. The French Audi TT rival is fun to drive and fairly cheap to run”

Carbuyer Rating

3.8 out of 5

Owners Rating

4.4 out of 5

77%of people would recommend this car to a friend.

Owner Rating

  • 32reviews
  • 5reviews
  • 2reviews
  • 3reviews

Common Problems

  • Suspension (1 cases)
  • Electrics (9 cases)
  • Brakes, Electrics, Engine (1 cases)
  • Other (3 cases)
  • Electrics, Engine, Gearbox / clutch, Other (1 cases)
  • Brakes (2 cases)
  • Electrics, Engine (2 cases)
  • Brakes, Electrics, Engine, Gearbox / clutch, Other (1 cases)
  • Electrics, Engine, Gearbox / clutch, Suspension, Other (1 cases)
  • Engine, Gearbox / clutch (1 cases)
  • Engine (1 cases)

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

1.5-2 litre, Diesel, Manual

Year of registration

2011

Average annual mileage

10,000 – 14,999

Owned

1 - 2 years

Bought Car

Used

Typical MPG

40

Owner Review

4 out of 5

Version

1.5-2 litre, Petrol, Semi Auto

Year of registration

2012

Average annual mileage

0 – 4,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used

Typical MPG

28
Review
Been very pleased so far
Running Cost

4 out of 5

Think the car seems to be pretty good for the type of car that it is

Owner Review

4 out of 5

Version

1.5-2 litre, Diesel, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

10,000 – 14,999

Owned

1 - 2 years

Bought Car

New

Typical MPG

49
Review
Never any worries, the car feels well built.
Running Cost

4 out of 5

No car is going to get a 5, unless it runs on air and fixes itself! So 4 is as good as it gets. Costs should have been accepted before you buy the car. So no wingeing about tyre prices.

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

GT, 2.0-litre to 3.0-litre, Diesel, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

10,000 – 14,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used
Review
Peugeot rcz is a fantastic car! Can't wait to drive it every day....

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

gt, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used
Review
Everthing i expected. Economical with good performance and a boot big enough to carry my mountain bike and kit. Comfortable on long rides. Great at cruising along the motorway or thrashing around a and b roads. Insurance costs running costs and tax and cheap for a car that looks more expensive than it is

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

gt, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used
Review
A stunning headturner with good performance excellent handling and it brings a smile to my face - and its not an audi tt.

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

GT HDi, 2.0-litre to 3.0-litre, Diesel, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used
Review
This is beyond my expectations, first peugeot,first diesel and absolutely delighted. The car style is fantastic,many admirers and hope there is a car as stylish as this one when i change my car in future. I love it more than any other car i have ever had.

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

GT, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used
Review
Fantastic, both in appearance and so far, reliability and performance.

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

Sport, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used
Review
Gorgeous styling, build quality is very good, performance is good too. Lovely car to drive and comes with lots of toys as standard making it excellent value for money.

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

GT, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

10,000 – 14,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used

Owner Review

4 out of 5

Version

, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2011

Average annual mileage

10,000 – 14,999

Bought Car

Used

Owner Review

2 out of 5

Version

gt, 2.0-litre to 3.0-litre, Diesel, Manual

Year of registration

2011

Average annual mileage

0 – 4,999

Bought Car

Used
Reliability

1 out of 5

Reliability ok Build quality completely corroded underneath and peugeot will not give me a new car from date of purchase which was 20/7/11
Running Cost

3 out of 5

The car is now garaged as too many faults arising.

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

GT, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2011

Average annual mileage

15,000 – 19,999

Bought Car

Used
Reliability

4 out of 5

only problem failure of clock replaced
Running Cost

5 out of 5

Insurance has proved to be cheaper than my bwm118i and mpg better

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

Sport, , Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Bought Car

Used
Reliability

4 out of 5

On the whole the car feels well built. Had to have replacement wing mirrors fitted under warranty. A known problem of corrosion inside the unit.
Running Cost

5 out of 5

For a petrol and a coupe I've been very impressed. Average 44 mg with mixture of urban and B roads.

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

HDI GT, 2.0-litre to 3.0-litre, Diesel, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Bought Car

Used
Reliability

5 out of 5

Reliable economical,fault with door mirrors,creaking when opening and closing. These have been replaced under warranty.
Running Cost

5 out of 5

On average 53 to the gallon,£115 yearly road tax.

Owner Review

1 out of 5

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

0 – 4,999

Owned

More than 5 years

Bought Car

Used
Review
Been having problems with this vehicle for some time now. Serviced vehicle and was told there was no reported problems and was made to feel like an idiot. Less than 800 Klms later I had it on the back of a tilt tray on its way to the service department. Overheating light kept coming on and was telling me to turn off engine. Also the hill start brake was sticking on, even tho I was never on a hill at any stage. So I've been told I need a thermostat sensor and there's none in Australia. So they want $1200.00 and 6 weeks while we wait for this part to come from Peugeot. Yep o/s I don't understand why there's not parts here as this is a COMMON problem with this car even with low Klms . Why isn't Peugeot doing something to fix this problem, like a recall. No backup support, so you really get what you pay for. DON'T buy this brand of vehicle. I don't even want to give it a one star but it won't let me take it away. Buyer beware.

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

2.0 HDI GT

Year of registration

2011

Average annual mileage

10,000 – 14,999

Owned

1 - 2 years

Bought Car

New

Typical MPG

45
Review
Excellent car, no issues and always puts a smile on my car. The build quality is very good and a good overall car.

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

1.5-2 litre, Diesel, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Owned

1 - 2 years

Bought Car

Used

Typical MPG

48
Review
Car only been in for service.
Running Cost

5 out of 5

Average mpg 48,have had 60 on motorway.

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

GT, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

10,000 – 14,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

GT, 2.0-litre to 3.0-litre, Diesel, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

More than 20,000

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used
Review
Fantastic move forward for peugeot

Owner Review

2 out of 5

Version

GT, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

10,000 – 14,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used
Review
Very poor build quality. Its been disapointing to say the least

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

GT, 2.0-litre to 3.0-litre, Diesel, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

New
Review
Brings back the joy of motoring!

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

GT, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used
Review
The peugeot rcz is a well built, stylish coupe, that has put the fun back into driving, for a bargain price ! C'mon audi tt, wot you got to say about that !

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

GT, 2.0-litre to 3.0-litre, Diesel, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

More than 20,000

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used
Review
Style, pace and grace - its everything a coupe should be. Build quality seems very good, no rattles and no problems to date.visibility is good but its all to easy to kerb the 19 inch alloys and i am not looking forward to replacing the tyres due to the price - but they do seem to be wearing very well

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

156 Gt, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Bought Car

Used

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

, 2.0-litre to 3.0-litre, Diesel, Manual

Year of registration

2011

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Bought Car

Used

Owner Review

3 out of 5

Version

G.T, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Automatic

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Bought Car

Used
Reliability

1 out of 5

from the first month had a noise from my grinding/scrunching noise when applying the brakes,they replaced the rear discs,still the same,then they asked a peugeot tech to look at the problem,they replaced the front discs and pads,the noise is still present said its normal in auto cars still very annoyed as it took nearly 1 year to have the fault looked at and still not rectified
Running Cost

3 out of 5

not so good round town but very good on a long run

Owner Review

4 out of 5

Version

gt 200 bhp, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Bought Car

New
Reliability

5 out of 5

no problems
Running Cost

3 out of 5

30mpg

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

GT 156bhp, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Bought Car

New
Reliability

4 out of 5

Build quality is excellent however it has a niggling rattle that appears to come from under the car. Been to the garage twice but they can't find it and its not thre all the time so they haven't heard it!
Running Cost

5 out of 5

For such a sprightly car the running costs are amazing. It does 40mpg on average!

Owner Review

2 out of 5

Version

1.6 200bhp turbo

Year of registration

2011

Bought Car

New
Review
I love this car but since having it (2.5 years) it has been the garage twice for big fixes. It has now got another engine problem, will find out tomorrow, more££££. I have been umming and rrrring whether to get another.(that's a no) Just want something reliable(shame), cos it looks good, spacious, has a great bite and is economical on fuel.
Reliability

2 out of 5

Due to constant problems no.
Performance

5 out of 5

Again when working excellent.
Running Cost

2 out of 5

Other than fixing cost, fuel is excellent.

Owner Review

1 out of 5

Version

1.6 200BHP

Year of registration

2012

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Owned

1 - 2 years

Bought Car

Used

Typical MPG

34
Review
Worst car I've ever owned. Constant problems with squealing brakes, rattling exhaust, 2 new clutches, faulty sat nav and stereo, oil leaks, water leaks, internal rattles. The car has been back to the dealer more than 30 times in the last 18 months, and they still haven't fixed it to my satisfaction. Peugeot are a dreadful company to deal with, and I have found they try and wriggle out of warranty claims wherever possible, or use the "they all do that" as an answer. I had intended to keep this car and trade it in for an RCZ R, but I will never touch another Peugeot due not only to my experience with this car, but the appalling customer service from Peugeot themselves.
Reliability

1 out of 5

Dreadful, the most unreliable car I have ever owned. A good choice if you want to spend more time with your Peugeot Service Manager than your family.
Performance

3 out of 5

Adequate, but nothing special.
Running Cost

4 out of 5

Reasonably good MPG, and tax and insurance are cheap too.

Owner Review

2 out of 5

Version

1.6 GT (200) manual

Year of registration

2011

Average annual mileage

15,000 – 19,999

Owned

2 - 3 years

Bought Car

Used
Review
Very happy with the look of the car, but thats where it stops. After 3 years it has probably been in the garage a month of that time. Lost count of the number of times sensors / coolant has been fixed (at least 6), sat nav screen replaced, chrome over doors replaced, oil leak from gear box, knocking noise on front suspension when new, replacement tyres took ages, etc. Peugeot Contract Hire team have been mainly unhelpful at the end of the contract with only one exceptional staff member. Glad I have replaced with an Audi R8.

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

GT HDI 163

Year of registration

2012

Average annual mileage

15,000 – 19,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

New

Typical MPG

47
Review
Overall very impressed with the car, Very good build quality and can honestly say the interior has a very premium feel. The handling is excellent and comes with all the gadgets you would ever need. Fuel consumption is remarkable for a 2.0 litre. Use the car on a day to day basis and not had any issues. Smiles all around.

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

1.5-2 litre, Diesel, Manual

Year of registration

2012

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used

Typical MPG

45
Review
No problems

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

1.5-2 litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2012

Average annual mileage

0 – 4,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used

Typical MPG

37
Review
2 niggling electronics faults. dealer was excellent
Running Cost

5 out of 5

just my play car - when its thirsty - its just having fun like me

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

1.5-2 litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2012

Average annual mileage

10,000 – 14,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used

Typical MPG

38.1
Review
I've had no problems since I bought even on quite vflooded roads.
Running Cost

4 out of 5

I get 38 MPG without trying it is qick off the mark and fun to drive and I've had a lot of hot hatches as well but non as economical as this.

Owner Review

4 out of 5

Version

1.5-2 litre, Petrol

Year of registration

2012

Average annual mileage

0 – 4,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

New

Typical MPG

30
Review
very reliable with no problems to report
Running Cost

3 out of 5

expensive petrol running costs, but insurance tax etc average running costs

Owner Review

4 out of 5

Version

1.5-2 litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

0 – 4,999

Owned

1 - 2 years

Bought Car

Used

Typical MPG

34
Running Cost

4 out of 5

Could be better

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

1.5-2 litre, Diesel, Manual

Year of registration

2011

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Owned

1 - 2 years

Bought Car

New

Typical MPG

45

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

1.5-2 litre, Petrol

Year of registration

2011

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Owned

1 - 2 years

Bought Car

Used

Typical MPG

40
Review
so far so good: no issues.
Running Cost

5 out of 5

absolutely brilliant. For a sporty number to achieve over 45 mpg on a run and 39 around time is amazing.

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

GT, 2.0-litre to 3.0-litre, Diesel, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

More than 20,000

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used
Review
The best 2+2 for the price in the market with wow looks

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

GT, 2.0-litre to 3.0-litre, Diesel, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

More than 20,000

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

GT, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

10,000 – 14,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used
Review
Love the unique styling and the eager performance. I love how it makes me smile whenever i look out the window and how every drive becomes an event. The journey is as important as the destination and for the price, nothing comes close.

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

gt, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used
Review
One of the best from peugeot.

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

GT, 2.0-litre to 3.0-litre, Diesel, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used
Review
So far very happy with the whole package

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

156 Sport, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used
Review
Head turning looks, great to drive, plenty of driver comforts

Owner Review

4 out of 5

Version

Gt, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

More than 20,000

Bought Car

New

Owner Review

4 out of 5

Version

GT, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2011

Average annual mileage

10,000 – 14,999

Bought Car

Used
Reliability

5 out of 5

Has been fine since new
Running Cost

4 out of 5

Very efficient petrol engine

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

GT, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2011

Average annual mileage

10,000 – 14,999

Bought Car

Used
Reliability

5 out of 5

It's perfect
Running Cost

5 out of 5

Actually cost-effective all things given

Owner Review

3 out of 5

Version

sport, 2.0-litre to 3.0-litre, Diesel, Manual

Year of registration

2011

Average annual mileage

More than 20,000

Bought Car

Used
Reliability

3 out of 5

Exhaust pipe ratteling and blowing

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

GT, 2.0-litre to 3.0-litre, Diesel, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

10,000 – 14,999

Bought Car

New
Reliability

5 out of 5

No problems at all with reliability, seems to be put together well no rattles or squeaks. Good solidly built car
Running Cost

5 out of 5

Great fuel consumption for a car that offers performance.

Owner Review

4 out of 5

Version

GT, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Bought Car

Used

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

gt, 2.0-litre to 3.0-litre, Diesel, Manual

Year of registration

2011

Average annual mileage

0 – 4,999

Bought Car

Used
Reliability

5 out of 5

the car is well made for the price of car,and has been trouble free
Running Cost

5 out of 5

the only running costs i have had is the diesel and i get between 550-600 mies to the tank

Owner Review

2 out of 5

Version

Gt 200

Year of registration

2011

Average annual mileage

10,000 – 14,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

New

Typical MPG

39
Review
I really wanted to like this car, and bought one despite experiencing poor reliability from Peugeot company cars in the distant past. Bold design and excellent standard equipment don't make up for the fact that it has been very unreliable. New cylinder head, comms module, boot release, thermostat, temperature sensor, etcetera etc. In 9 months of ownership it has been garaged, towed or subject to roadside repair at least once per month. I've just taken a massive loss to trade it for a C-Class coupe. Shame because economy is good and it goes like stink, showing a clean pair of heels to most things on the road in mid range overtaking. Not so great off the mark where the tyres can scrabble for grip making an untidy getaway and shift from 1st to 2nd. Averaged 39mpg over last 9,000 miles.

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

1.5-2 litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

0 – 4,999

Owned

1 - 2 years

Bought Car

Used

Typical MPG

34
Review
No problems

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

1.5-2 litre, Diesel

Year of registration

2012

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used

Typical MPG

48

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

GT, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

New
Review
Great performance and looks - best round for the price

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

gt, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used
Review
Beautiful design, excellent handling, good fuel economy. head turner

Owner Review

4 out of 5

Version

200GT, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

15,000 – 19,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

GT, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

10,000 – 14,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used
Review
Beautiful to look at, sure-footed to drive and the cabin is a pleasure to be in. Cannot stop finding reasons to 'go out for...anything' to give me an excuse to drive it and put a smile on my face! Well done peugeot!!!

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

GT, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Automatic

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

0 – 4,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used
Review
A great car that gives you a feel good factor

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

gt, 2.0-litre to 3.0-litre, Diesel, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

sport, 2.0-litre to 3.0-litre, Diesel, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

More than 20,000

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used
Review
Early days yet, but impressed by performance v's economy. Styling certainly makes heads turn with positive comments.

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

Sport, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2011

Average annual mileage

0 – 4,999

Bought Car

Used

Owner Review

4 out of 5

Version

Gt, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Bought Car

Used

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

g.t. (launch edition), 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Bought Car

Used
Reliability

4 out of 5

no real problems. roof bars tarnished but replacements available.
Running Cost

5 out of 5

36mpg overall but 45- 50mpg on a long run.

Owner Review

4 out of 5

Version

Sport with easy motion pack, 2.0-litre to 3.0-litre, Diesel, Manual

Year of registration

2011

Average annual mileage

0 – 4,999

Bought Car

Used
Reliability

5 out of 5

quite good, servicing is fantastic

Owner Review

4 out of 5

Version

GT, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

10,000 – 14,999

Bought Car

Used

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

gt, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Bought Car

Used
Reliability

4 out of 5

Some minor trim warranty work

Owner Review

4 out of 5

Version

1.6 THP 156

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

15,000 – 19,999

Owned

3 - 5 years

Bought Car

Used

Typical MPG

41
Review
Excellent ride. Enough trunk for golf stuff. Well equipped. Bad clutch. Bad door handling.
Reliability

4 out of 5

Seats can be better. Door handles should be better build.
Performance

4 out of 5

Nice ride.

Owner Review

4 out of 5

Version

1.5-2 litre, Petrol, Automatic

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

10,000 – 14,999

Owned

1 - 2 years

Bought Car

Used

Typical MPG

18
Review
It has never let me down, even at high speeds.
Running Cost

3 out of 5

It's a thirsty vehicle, but I knew that prior to purchase.

Owner Review

4 out of 5

Version

1.5-2 litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2011

Average annual mileage

15,000 – 19,999

Owned

1 - 2 years

Bought Car

Used

Typical MPG

45
Review
Never had an issue.
Running Cost

3 out of 5

Tyres are expensive to replace.

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

1.5-2 litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Owned

1 - 2 years

Bought Car

New

Typical MPG

39
Review
Never let me down, though 2 niggles from nearly new - one engine noise on start up which is fixed; another is a rattlle under the car at low speeds. Still not fixed despite being in the garage 3-4 tmes for this
Running Cost

4 out of 5

Average 39 MPG in traffic on way to work. Motorway driving average 44 mpg which is great for the power of the engine. Servicing costs very reasonable so far.

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

1.5-2 litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2012

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used

Typical MPG

38.7
Review
No problems with car.
Running Cost

5 out of 5

It's great for the type of sports car

Owner Review

4 out of 5

Version

1.5-2 litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

10,000 – 14,999

Owned

1 - 2 years

Bought Car

Used

Typical MPG

36
Review
Couple of daft niggling issues which were resolved under warranty.
Running Cost

4 out of 5

Quite surprised how easy on the pocket the car is, a very welcome bonus of owning quite a pretty car.

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

Sport, 2.0-litre to 3.0-litre, Diesel, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

More than 20,000

Owned

Less than a year

Bought Car

Used
Review
Amazing drive and amazing design

Owner Review

4 out of 5

Version

GT, 2.0-litre to 3.0-litre, Diesel, Manual

Year of registration

2011

Average annual mileage

More than 20,000

Bought Car

Used
Reliability

4 out of 5

Build quality is very good but has developed he odd rattle. Mainly vibration caused by the upgraded stereo.
Running Cost

4 out of 5

Manufacturer MPG figures are a litte optimistic but does give 50+ on motorway runs. Tyres on 19" weels are ridiculously expensive as they are an unusual size. Cheap to tax and cheap to insure. Servicing is also very reasonable compared to my previous car.

Owner Review

3 out of 5

Version

gt, 2.0-litre to 3.0-litre, Diesel, Manual

Year of registration

2011

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Bought Car

Used
Reliability

4 out of 5

quality feel to the car
Running Cost

3 out of 5

official figures 50+ mpg combined. But in the real world and on the uk roads 41mpg

Owner Review

4 out of 5

Version

GT, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2011

Average annual mileage

15,000 – 19,999

Bought Car

New
Reliability

4 out of 5

The build quality is good and so far has been reliable
Running Cost

4 out of 5

The running costs have been less than I expected

Owner Review

4 out of 5

Version

GT, 2.0-litre to 3.0-litre, Diesel, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Bought Car

New
Review
-
Reliability

4 out of 5

Too early to comment on reliability, build quality is fairly good considering the manufacturer, as previously owned Audis and BMWs.
Running Cost

4 out of 5

Economy-wise it is fairly good, road fund is good, servicing costs are average though have not yet had service.

Owner Review

5 out of 5

Version

GT, 1.6-litre to 1.9-litre, Petrol, Manual

Year of registration

2010

Average annual mileage

5,000 – 9,999

Bought Car

Used

Most Popular

Ford EcoBoost engines: what are they and should you buy one?
2020 Ford Puma - front tracking
Ford Focus hatchback
10 Nov 2020

Ford EcoBoost engines: what are they and should you buy one?

Refreshed 2020 Land Rover Discovery breaks cover
Land Rover Discovery
10 Nov 2020

Refreshed 2020 Land Rover Discovery breaks cover

What is ESP on a car?
Tips and advice
10 Nov 2020

What is ESP on a car?