MG ZS SUV review

With compact SUVs now bigger business than ever, MG’s decision to increase its profile by launching a rival to the Renault Captur, Nissan Juke and SEAT Arona was very well judged. The MG ZS sits beneath the larger MG HS SUV in the brand’s growing lineup, but above the MG4 which blends hatchback proportions with SUV styling.

It's fair to say that while many recognise the history of the octagonal MG badge, the Chinese-owned brand struggled for mainstream acceptance when it first relaunched. With the ZS it managed to re-establish itself as a maker of cars with more to them than just a low sticker price. But is this family crossover truly cheerful as well as cheap?

14

Externally, it's hard to overlook the similarity between the ZS' nose treatment and that of the Mazda CX-30, but this lack of originality isn't necessarily a bad thing. All too often car companies proceed too far down the road to wackiness; instead, the MG ZS is entirely contemporary, with strong hints of SEAT design from the rear three-quarters. It's derivative, perhaps, but certainly doesn't look like it came from the bargain basement.

Pleasingly, the interior marks considerable progress from earlier MG models, with an up-to-date look and sensible layout that incorporates all the features that crossover buyers expect. Cruise control and Bluetooth, for instance, are standard across the range, as are LED daytime running lights and tail-lights. The top-spec Exclusive model is quite lavishly equipped, with sat-nav, heated front seats and a digital instrument panel, all for a starting price just below £20,000.

This puts it among the very cheapest SUVs on the market, with only the Dacia Duster available for much less outlay. And, although the Excite does without some of the glitzier features of more grandly equipped models, it's at this end of the range that the ZS demonstrates just how far your money goes.

Two petrol engines are offered: a 1.5-litre four-cylinder or more sophisticated 108bhp 1.0-litre three-cylinder turbocharged unit developed in partnership with General Motors. The latter can be fitted with a six-speed manual gearbox, or a six-speed, dual-clutch automatic transmission, while the 1.5-litre uses a traditional five-speed manual gearbox.

The turbocharged engine is the more expensive of the two; we found it quiet and smooth, although it isn't the last word in fuel economy. Its automatic gearbox isn't especially responsive, so either of the manual versions seem like a more sensible choice, unless you really need an automatic.

Performing better than the petrols, and with lower running costs, the electric MG ZS EV is arguably the most desirable version of MG's SUV, and we've reviewed it separately.

14

You're unlikely to be disappointed by the ZS when it comes to comfort. Although its smooth ride is achieved at the cost of razor-sharp handling, few will be concerned about this on a long motorway journey. Here, the quiet interior comes into its own, with plenty of space both inside and in the boot – the latter positively eclipses the Nissan Juke for luggage capacity.

Partnership

Need to sell your car?

Find your best offer from over 5,000+ dealers. It’s that easy.

Sell your car

Rated 'Excellent'  Trustpilot

So, practicality and comfort are certainly in the ZS' favour, while attractive pricing and inoffensive looks do nothing to weaken its case. Another notable strength is its seven-year/80,000-mile warranty, which almost matches that of the Kia Niro and trumps the five-year (albeit unlimited-mileage) policy of the Hyundai Kona.

Euro NCAP has put the ZS through its paces for safety and it scored a middling three out of five stars. But, indifferent fuel economy and safety aside, the ZS is a solid budget all-around package that offers the SUV experience for the price of a supermini.